[Cyclelicious] 10/18/2006 07:34:56 AM

"vain enough to expect anyone to stop" indeed. Hmmm... if there were tractor trailer drivers maknig mayhem on her route, would she feel as obligated to find anouther route?

--
Posted by SueJ to Cyclelicious at 10/18/2006 07:34:56 AM

[Cyclelicious] 10/14/2006 11:25:53 PM

Hey Fritz. It's been awhile. Haven't blogged about pixel advertising in ages. Thought you might find it interesting that I've finally declared pixel ads dead. Do you concur?

--
Posted by Richard to Cyclelicious at 10/14/2006 11:25:53 PM

[Cyclelicious] 10/09/2006 04:59:55 PM

Or, the public can start insisting on promoting the safety and road sharing. Ask me in a year if this is possible...

--
Posted by SueJ to Cyclelicious at 10/09/2006 04:59:55 PM

[Cyclelicious] 10/09/2006 10:52:33 AM

Cycling to work will become more common if people feel safe sharing the road with cars. As a cycling commuter I see no promoting of safety and road sharing which should be aimed at the drivers through newspapers or radio or whatever local media is available.
I see gas prices going through the roof the only way to bring about a change of consciousness about cycling, otherwise people have no incentive to change.

--
Posted by Marie to Cyclelicious at 10/09/2006 10:52:33 AM

[Cyclelicious] 10/02/2006 08:00:37 AM

I read about this in MTB action I think. I agree, it's very interesting. I wonder how heavy it is?

--
Posted by Scott to Cyclelicious at 10/02/2006 08:00:37 AM

[Cyclelicious] 9/25/2006 07:35:21 PM

http://bikewinter.org/

IL, WI, and MI winter biking events. My favorite? The Santa Rampage!!

--
Posted by willow naeco to Cyclelicious at 9/25/2006 07:35:21 PM

[Cyclelicious] 9/22/2006 01:14:36 PM

What goes around...

--
Posted by Michael to Cyclelicious at 9/22/2006 01:14:36 PM

[Cyclelicious] 9/21/2006 10:32:37 AM

So motorized bicycles can't go over 20 MPH, but what about human-powered bicycles?

--
Posted by Michael to Cyclelicious at 9/21/2006 10:32:37 AM

[Cyclelicious] 9/13/2006 04:08:03 PM

When my kids were in elementary school, I worked an early shift so I could meet them for the walk home. It was a pleasant, 10 minute walk of about half a mile. Some parents and kids were appalled that I'd make them walk 'all that way'!

We're turning into a nation of fat, lazy, complacent people, driving round and round in the parking lot so we don't have to walk too far getting into the gym for some exercise.

--
Posted by Ed W to Cyclelicious at 9/13/2006 04:08:03 PM

[Cyclelicious] 9/12/2006 11:07:23 AM

Paul pointed out the central idea this 'study' neglected, and that's lane positioning. According to the LCI list, there's a chart showing the author's greates distance from the curb was a little over a meter. Hugging the curb is a sure-fire way to have motorists pass far too closely.

I may have more on this later over on CycleDog, Fritz.

--
Posted by Ed W to Cyclelicious at 9/12/2006 11:07:23 AM

[Cyclelicious] 9/12/2006 01:52:44 AM

I wonder if the helmet is the key or just the appearance. If I'm wearing "urban warrior " clothing, a messenger bag, dark sunglasses but no helmet will vehicles also pass closer to me?

--
Posted by Colin to Cyclelicious at 9/12/2006 01:52:44 AM

[Cyclelicious] 9/11/2006 07:10:32 PM

I have a strong suspicion that crash rates have a direct effect on the number of injuries and deaths...

--
Posted by Fritz to Cyclelicious at 9/11/2006 07:10:32 PM

[Cyclelicious] 9/08/2006 07:22:02 PM

That guy should be arrested for those disgusting pants as well. Tell me that is not in fashion anywhere.

--
Posted by uncadan8 to Cyclelicious at 9/08/2006 07:22:02 PM

[Cyclelicious] 9/06/2006 06:18:15 PM

I dunno, Fritz, but I'll take the contrarian position. That inverted U rack could take 4 bikes in a very small space if they were positioned right. The rack I use at work is similar, but it has multiple U's designed for 8 or 10 bikes. Of course, mine is the only one in it.

One other aspect of inverted U racks is that they're pedestrian friendly - at least when no bikes are present. Compared to some of the 'art' bike racks, this is a plus.

--
Posted by Ed W to Cyclelicious at 9/06/2006 06:18:15 PM

[Cyclelicious] 9/06/2006 02:44:41 PM

I've seen some inverted U's (and similar designs) with an instructional illustration on them. Is that a good solution?

--
Posted by Fritz to Cyclelicious at 9/06/2006 02:44:41 PM

[Cyclelicious] 9/06/2006 11:34:50 AM

Parking parallel still provides parking for two bikes -- one bike on either side of the rack like in this photo.

--
Posted by Fritz to Cyclelicious at 9/06/2006 11:34:50 AM

[Cyclelicious] 8/28/2006 11:50:25 AM

After I posted about this thing in Asheville, I wondered how much the "reporting" was exaggerated in the alternative news outlet I found this at; and from an anonymous source to boot.

--
Posted by Fritz to Cyclelicious at 8/28/2006 11:50:25 AM

[Cyclelicious] 8/20/2006 08:22:35 AM

I think the "strategy of pedaling really fast" was my favorite one too.

--
Posted by Michael to Cyclelicious at 8/20/2006 08:22:35 AM

[Cyclelicious] 8/20/2006 05:19:50 AM

I love this! Hilarious!

--
Posted by Tom Stormcrowe to Cyclelicious at 8/20/2006 05:19:50 AM

[Cyclelicious] 8/19/2006 09:29:36 PM

". . . strategy of pedaling really fast."

ROFL!!!

--
Posted by Eric to Cyclelicious at 8/19/2006 09:29:36 PM